Kaprow is one happenin' dude |
I think that Kaprow's idea of creating art without creating a physical product is really interesting. I like the idea that this kind of art can be so interactive and how each performance is unique. I also thought it was interesting to talk about how repeating or even discussing his specific Happenings would in some way take away from them, since they are meant to be seen only once and in person. I enjoyed creating our own Happening in class the other day, although the Happening we performed didn't seem to make anyone particularly uncomfortable, which seems like a common theme in Kaprow's other Happenings. Maybe next time we should lick jam off of the mirrors or something.
I'm still working on adding subtitles to the interviews and will upload a few more clips to be translated be someone who speaks Tagalog. Hopefully will find someone soon...
I agree with you about the comparison between Beuys and Kaprow. I think that Kaprow's works were meant to mean something different to each participant, so participating in Routine helped drive that idea home.
ReplyDeleteYour video is coming along really well! Although it is rather unfortunate that you have to rely on so many other people in order to come up with the final product. Good luck!
I think the same thing about how Kaprows work is easier to relate and understand then Beuys. Good luck on the video! Its quite the collaboration project but I think your handling it very well. :)
ReplyDeleteIt is an interesting point that Kaprow seems to put Beuys into context in some ways since from the perspective of students like us, in this time, in the U.S. his ideas and undertakings seem more accessible. I wonder who feels the opposite? Perhaps a German art student in the 60's?
ReplyDeleteKaprow was so much about play and perhaps his work is distinctly American. Beuys makes his art with old-timey materials that were once more commonplace (lard, honey, rotting sausage) decades ago. Memories of elderly german relatives' rural basements come to mind circa 1962.
ReplyDelete